Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Sipp

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 1912No. 7,573PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Prom Superior Court of Vanderburgh. County; Alexander Gilchrist, Judge. Action by William W. Sipp and others against Hiram W. Barrett and another. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant Hiram W. Barrett appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.

— This was an action brought by appellees against appellant and William C. Barrett, to recover on a promissory note executed by appellant and others. Prom a judgment in favor of appellees this appeal was taken, and the following alleged errors are relied on for a reversal: That the court erred (1) in overruling appellant’s demurrer to the amended complaint; (2) in its second and third conclusions of law on the special finding of facts; (3) in overruling appellant’s motion for a venire de novo; (4) in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.

Appellee’s amended complaint is, in substance,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Tayloe v. T. & S. SandifordSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  2. Cremer v. HigginsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1817
  3. Kealing v. VansickleIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Binford v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Bradway v. GroenendykeIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Webb v. Crane Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1938
  2. American Woolen Co. v. MaagetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  3. Moore v. OhlIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Carson v. Cook County Liquor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Gradeless v. Gradeless, Admr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API