Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1886No. 12,396PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From the Steuben Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

Appellee has filed a written motion to dismiss this appeal, “ for the reason that there is no assignment of errors entered on the transcript herein, as required by law.” *44The reason thus assigned is not shown to be true by the transcript herein, or in any other manner. The assignment of errors, is entered on a blank page of the transcript, in substantial compliance with the requirements of the statute. Section 655, R. S. 1881.' The motion to dismiss this appeal is overruled, with costs.

Errors are properly assigned here by appellant, the defendant below, which call in question (1) the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fort Wayne, Jackson & Saginaw R. R. v. HusselmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Donellan v. HardyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Rudolph v. LaneIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Kinney v. DodgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Lassiter v. JackmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. City of South Bend v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. KiddIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Bowen v. SwanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Colchen v. NindeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Becknell v. BecknellIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API