In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered Person MH 91-00558
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOCI, Presiding Judge.
W.C. appeals from the trial court’s finding that she is acutely disabled and its order that she serve 365 days of combined inpatient and outpatient treatment. Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 36-501(29)(b) provides that a person is persistently or acutely disabled if that person suffers from a mental disorder that:
Substantially impairs the person’s capacity to make an informed decision regarding treatment and this impairment causes the person to be incapable of understanding and expressing an understanding of the advantages and disadvantages…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Matter of Cause No. Mh-90-00566Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JS-4130Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County of Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- In re MH 2007-001236Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- In Re the Appeal in Pima County Mental Health Service Action No. MH-1140-6-93.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- In re MH 2008-000438Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- In Re Mh Xxxx-XxxxxxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.