Legal Opinion

Appeal in Pima County Mental Health Case No. MH 1717-1-85

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 19, 1986No. 2 CA-CIV 5587PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LIVERMORE, Presiding Judge.

This appeal attacks the constitutional validity of the recently amended civil commitment law. Appellant contends that the definition of “danger to others” in A.R.S. § 36-501(3) is insufficient as a basis for commitment. That section reads:

“Danger to others” means that the judgment of a person who has a mental disorder is so impaired that he is unable to understand his need for treatment and as a result of his mental disorder his continued behavior can reasonably be expected, on the basis of competent medical opinion, to result in serious physical harm.

Her…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Project Release v. PrevostCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  3. Stamus v. LeonhardtDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1976
  4. People v. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. SteelmanArizona Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of Cause No. Mh-90-00566Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  2. People v. StevensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. In Re Pima County Mental Health No. MH 2081-3-90Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. In Re: Mh2019-004895Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  5. In Re Pinal County Mental Health Case Mh202400075Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API