Legal Opinion

LaGuire v. Kain

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1992No. Docket Nos. 89871, 90657, (Calendar Nos. 6-7)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.

The question presented in these companion cases is whether Michigan’s Liquor Control Act, as amended in 1986,1 entitles a minor’s estate or a minor’s family to recover from a liquor licensee for injuries allegedly resulting from the licensee’s illegal provision of alcohol to a minor. We hold that the 1986 amendments of the dramshop act bar both a minor’s estate and the family of that minor from recovery under the act. Therefore, we reverse the decisions of the Court of Appeals in Waranica v Cheers Good Time Saloons, Inc, 186 Mich App 398; 464 NW2d 902 (1990), and LaGuire v Kain, 185 Mich App…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Browder v. International Fidelity InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Stowers v. WolodzkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Longstreth v. GenselMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In Re Petition of State Highway CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Brooks v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dedes v. AschMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Klever v. Canton Sachsenheim, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Lozada v. Dale Baker Oldsmobile, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001
  4. In Re SpradlinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
  5. Hoover Corners, Inc. v. ConklinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API