Boston Scientific Corp. v. MICRUS CORP.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
FIRST CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
JAMES WARE, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Boston Scientific Corp. and Target Therapeutics, Inc. 1 (“Plaintiffs,” or collectively, “Boston Scientific”) bring this action against Micrus Corp. (“Defendant” or “Micrus”) for alleged patent infringement of two patents relating to methods and devices for treating vascular medical problems. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant willfully infringed, and continues to infringe (1) U.S. Patent No. 5,895,385 (the “'385 Patent”) entitled “Endovascular Electrolytieally Detachable Wire and Tip for the Formation of Thrombus in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lam Research Corp. v. Schunk SemiconductorDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- ImmerVision, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- Ralph J. Lamson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Schuyleman v. Barnhart Crane and Rigging CoDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.