Legal Opinion
Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 31, 2014No. Case No. 2:12-cv-7360-MRP-MRWxPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. § 112(f)
MARIANA R. PFAELZER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Enfish, LLC (“Enfish”) has sued Defendants Microsoft Corporation, Fiserv, I nc., Intuit, Inc., Sage Software, Inc., and Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) for infringement of two patents: U.S. Patent No. 6,151,604 (“the '604 Patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 6,163,775 (“the '775 Patent”). Defendants move for summary judgment of invalidity as to Claims 1, 2, and 16 of the '604 Patent as an invalid single-means claim…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Walter C. Fiers v. Michel Revel and Pierre Tiollais v. Haruo Sugano, Masami Muramatsu and Tadatsugu TaniguchiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Carroll v. ToeleDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- ImmerVision, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- Immervision, Inc. v. Apple Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2026