Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LINN, Circuit Judge.
Ficosa North America Corporation, Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. de C.V. (“Ficosa”) appeal the final judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan entered in favor of Teleflex, Inc. (“Teleflex”). The district court entered judgment following a jury verdict that Ficosa infringed Tele-flex’s U.S. Patent No. 5,632,182 (“the '182 patent”), and that Teleflex’s U.S. Patent No. 4,581,953 (“the '953 patent”) and the '182 patent were not invalid. Ficosa appeals the denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) of…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by630 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Texas Digital Systems, Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
625 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.