Legal Opinion
Schuyleman v. Barnhart Crane and Rigging Co
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided May 15, 2025No. 2:23-cv-00562Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 JAY SCHUYLEMAN, CASE NO. C23-0562JLR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 12 BARNHART CRANE AND 13 RIGGING CO., et al., 14 Defendants. 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court are the parties’ dueling Daubert motions to exclude evidence and 17 testimony. Defendants Barnhart Crane and Rigging Co. and Barnhart Crane and Rigging 18 LLC (collectively, “Barnhart”) move the court to (i) exclude the testimony and report of 19 Richard W. Klopp, Ph.D. (Klopp Mot. (Dkt. # 92); Klopp Reply (Dkt. # 106)); (ii) strike 20 portions…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.