Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Molovinsky

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 13, 1984No. Misc. Docket (BV) No. 21, September Term, 1980PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLE, Judge.

This matter originally came to our attention in 1980, when we considered a petition, filed in accordance with Maryland Rule BV16, to suspend Gale Sanders Molovinsky (Molovinsky) from the practice of law. Because on July 31, 1980, Molovinsky had been found guilty of conspiracy to counterfeit United States Federal Reserve Notes, we entered an order suspending him “from the practice of law until further Order of this Court.” On appeal, Molovinsky’s conviction in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland was affirmed. United States v. Molovinsky, 688 F.2d 243 (4th…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Braverman v. Bar Assn. of Balto.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AndresenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ReamerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. EzrinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. In Re FrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  3. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. HoppCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KahlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BakasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API