Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kahl

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 29, 2014No. 81ag/11PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, C.J. (Retired).

The petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (the petitioner), acting through Bar Counsel and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751(a), 1 filed, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751, a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action against Jeffrey David Kahl, the respondent. In that petition, it alleged that the respondent violated Rules 1.15, Safekeeping Property, 2 8.1, Bar Admissions and Disciplinary Matters, 3 and 8.4, Misconduct, 4 of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (“MRPC”), as adopted by Maryland Rule 16-812; Maryland Rules 16-606.1,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. EzrinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BakasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API