Legal Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. Hopp

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 23, 1993No. Misc. (Subtitle BV) No. 18, September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT M. BELL, Judge.

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, the petitioner, filed, on July 24, 1992, at the direction of the Review Board, see Maryland Rule BV7.b., a Petition for Disciplinary Action (the “Petition”) against Kenneth Harvey Hopp, the respondent. The charges involved the respondent’s handling, in 1979 and 1980, of two matters in California. 1 Although he was admitted to the practice of law in Maryland on July 30, 1958, the respondent has not practiced in this State since 1962 and does not maintain an office here. The petition charged that the respondent misused client…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. EzrinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BakasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. HambyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VelasquezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SabghirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GittensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API