Legal Opinion
Heilman v. Courtney
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 24, 2019No. A17-0863Published
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Justice.
Appellant Donald Heilman, a participant in the Challenge Incarceration Program administered by the Department of Corrections (Department), contends that he was "released from prison" within the meaning of Minn. Stat. § 169A.276, subd. 1(d) (2018), when he entered phase II of that program. Heilman asserts that, under the correct statutory analysis, the State failed to calculate his conditional-release term correctly and revoked his conditional release improperly after it had already ended.1 The district court granted judgment on the pleadings to the State on Heilman's ensuing…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. WukawitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- City of Brainerd v. Brainerd Investments PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Metropolitan CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.