Legal Opinion
In Re William D.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 19, 2006No. AC 26688PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The respondent, William D., appeals from the order of the trial court granting the motion of the petitioner, the commissioner of children and families (commissioner), to extend the respondent’s delinquency commitment by twelve months pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-141 (b). On appeal, the respondent claims that the court improperly concluded that he was a child for purposes of the statute and therefore found that it had jurisdiction to extend his commitment. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The respondent was bom on May 14,1988. On November 13, 2003, after he…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kinsey v. Pacific Employers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- In re Stevem M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Private Healthcare Systems, Inc. v. TorresSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- In re Darien S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Matey v. Estate of DemberConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lyon v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- In re William D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. LesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Winsor v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- In re S.D.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.