Legal Opinion
Rasmuson v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 8, 2010No. 09-158PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING CLASS CERTIFICATION
SUSAN G. BRADEN, Judge.
This Memorandum Opinion and Order concerns Plaintiffs’ request for certification of a class action, pursuant to RCFC 23. For the reasons discussed herein, the court declines to certify a class action at this time, because the court is not satisfied that the numerosity requirement of RCFC 23 has been met. The court, however, reserves the right to consider this issue after further discovery.
I. THE NATIONAL TRAILS SYSTEM ACT AND AMENDMENTS AND PROCEDURE TO ABANDON A RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY.
The Surface Transportation…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Miami County Board of Commissioners v. Kanza Rail-Trails Conservancy, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Singleton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Douglas R. Bigelow Trust v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.