Cummins v. Yellow & Checker Cab Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HARDEN, J., pro tem.
The plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, brought separate actions against defendants for damages on account of personal injuries received in an automobile accident. Said actions were consolidated for trial. A separate verdict was rendered in each case in .favor of the defendants, upon which judgment was entered accordingly. The motion of each plaintiff for a new trial having been denied, separate appeals have been taken from the judgments and orders denying new trial.
At about 7:45 P. M. on August 24, 1926, plaintiffs were riding in a southerly direction on the westerly…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. ConklingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Gornstein v. PriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Seller v. Market-Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Polk v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Kalfus v. FrazeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Hill v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Withey v. Hammond Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- People v. PorterfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.