Legal Opinion

Withey v. Hammond Lumber Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 1934No. Civ. No. 8723PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIS, J., pro tem.

This action was brought by plaintiff against Hammond Lumber Company, a corporation, J. W. MacDonald and C. W. Driver, individually and doing business under the firm name of MacDonald and Driver, and John Doe. The latter appeared and answered in the person of L. J. McCormick, an employee of Hammond Lumber Company. The complaint in its essentials alleged that while plaintiff was walking on a sidewalk the defendants negligently drove and operated a large lumber truck in and upon the sidewalk, striking plaintiff and causing the injuries complained of and for which damages are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crooks v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Carter v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Johnstone v. Panama Pacific International Exposition Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Comstock v. MorseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Russell v. Pacific Can Co.California Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shifflette v. Walkup Drayage & Warehouse Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Dayton v. LandonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Provin v. Continental Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Monroe v. East Bay Rental ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Marsh v. ButtersWyoming Supreme Court · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API