Legal Opinion
Oregon Short Line R. v. Clark County Highway Dist.
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided January 3, 1927No. 617PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, District Judge.
The defendant is a highway district of Idaho, organized pursuant to the provisions of chapter 66, and particularly sections 1491, 1492, 1493,1494, 1495,1506, and 1507, of the Compiled Statutes (1919) of that state. Through it runs one of the main lines of the plaintiff Oregon Short Line Railroad Company, 37.5 miles in length'. The district proposes to issue bonds in the amount of $100,000 for the construction and improvement of highways within its boundaries. Under the law funds for the payment of the bonds are to be realized from ad valorem taxes. The assessed value…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Browning v. HooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Shoshone Highway District v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
- Oregon Short Line R. v. Kimama Highway Dist.District Court, D. Idaho · 1923
- Kimama Highway Dist. v. Oregon Short Line R.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
- Yale Highway Dist. v. Oregon Short Line R.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Sacramento Municipal Utility Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- San Saba County Water Control & Improvement Dist. No. 1 v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Oregon Short Line R. v. Clark County Highway Dist.District Court, D. Idaho · 1927
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Sacramento Municipal Utility Dist.District Court, N.D. California · 1936
- Delbert Smith v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.