Legal Opinion

Oregon Short Line R. v. Clark County Highway Dist.

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided October 22, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.

For a statement of most' of the salient facts' and certain features of law, reference is made to our decision of January 3, 1927. 17 F.(2d) 125. It now appears that at the date of that decision there were in Idaho 118 highway districts other than defendant, which like it had been organized pursuant to the provisions of the general Highway District Act, which we held to be invalid; and, possibly because of the decision, the state Legislature, then convening, passed certain curative measures, consisting of an omnibus act and 119 special acts, each purporting to validate…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Hodges v. SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Gast Realty & Investment Co. v. Schneider Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. (PS) Quantum Capital Funding Corporation v. PDI Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021
  2. Ana Hernandez, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated v. CONSUMER JUSTICE LAW FIRMDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2026
  3. Mira v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
  4. Renova Energy Corp. v. CuevasDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API