Legal Opinion
Kimama Highway Dist. v. Oregon Short Line R.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 7, 1924No. 4177PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
In July, 1922, the Kitnama highway district, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the state of Idaho, voted bonds of the district in the sum of $90,000 for the construction of a highway from east to west, through the district. The present suit was thereafter instituted by the Oregon Short Line Railroad Company, the principal property owner within the district, to restrain the highway commissioners from issuing or selling the bonds thus authorized. From a decree in favor of the plaintiff, this appeal is prosecuted.
There is little or no controversy over the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Myles Salt Co. v. Board of Comm'rs of Iberia and St. Mary Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Gast Realty & Investment Co. v. Schneider Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Lámar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Strickfaden v. Greencreek Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Stark v. McLaughlinIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
- City of San Diego v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
- Oregon Short Line R. v. Clark County Highway Dist.District Court, D. Idaho · 1927
- Yale Highway Dist. v. Oregon Short Line R.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925