Legal Opinion

Browning v. Hooper

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 11, 1926No. 256PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

Appellants own taxable real and personal property in that part of Archer County, Texas, defined as Road District No. 2. The appellees are the county judge and four commissioners, (constituting the county commissioners’ court,) the tax assessor and the sheriff of the county, who is the tax collector. Appellants brought this suit to restrain the issue or sale of bonds.of the road district in the amount of - $300,000 proposed to be sold to obtain money, for the construction, operation, and maintenance of roads in that district, and to restrain the levy of collection of any tax upon their…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. DecaturSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Valley Farms Co. of Yonkers v. County of WestchesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Embree v. Kansas City & Liberty Boulevard Road DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Hancock v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Withnell v. Ruecking Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Trimmier v. CarltonTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Whitney v. Hillsborough CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  5. Evans v. Beattie, Comptroller GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API