Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Sacramento Municipal Utility Dist.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an action in equity brought by the plaintiff utility company to enjoin the defendant municipal utility district from issuing proposed bonds to finance the construction and operation of a light, power, and heat system to serve the district.
The gravamen of the complaint is that the bonds will be a charge and lien upon property in the district, including that belonging to plaintiff; that, unless restrained, the defendant will levy taxes upon plaintiff’s property to meet the district’s obligations under the bonds; that plaintiff’s -property will receive no benefit by…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fenton v. City of DelanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Mariano & Assoc., PC v. Board of County Com'rs of Sublette CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Lammers v. HeartlandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- In Re Heartland Consumers Power DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Wapello County v. WardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.