Legal Opinion

Boyer v. Abston

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1976PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The plaintiffs brought this suit praying that they be adjudged owners of an easement over the property of defendants. The trial court found for the defendants and plaintiffs appeal. The proceedings being equitable, we review de novo.

The parties are adjacent property owners. The only access to plaintiffs’ property is a roadway known as Oak Hollow Road which passes through defendants’ property and in front of defendants’ home.

In 1945 the Gibsons, plaintiffs’ predecessors, began a sawmill operation which lasted until 1953 and operated again for a brief one-year period in 1957. During this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Woods v. HartOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Trewin v. HunterOregon Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wels v. HippeOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Shumate v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Arana v. PerlenfeinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Webb v. ClodfelterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Chambers v. DisneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API