Legal Opinion

Arana v. Perlenfein

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 9, 1998No. 94C-12214; CA A96142PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Steven Perlenfein appeals from a judgment granting John and Jeanne Arana a prescriptive easement through an alley on Perlenfein’s real property. Perlenfein argues that Aranas did not prove the requisite elements necessary to establish a prescriptive easement by clear and convincing evidence. On de novo review, ORS 19.415(3), we reverse.

Aranas and Perlenfein own property in Salem. An alley runs north and south through the middle of the block in which their property lies and connects adjoining streets. Aranas have an apartment building on their property in the northerly portion of the block,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Woods v. HartOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Anthony v. Kennard Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  4. Trewin v. HunterOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Hayward v. EllsworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. R & C. RANCH, LLC v. KundeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. Petersen v. Crook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Webb v. ClodfelterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Baylink v. ReesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Beebe v. DeMarcoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API