Chambers v. Disney

*686NEWMAN, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment granting plaintiffs a road easement by prescription over defendants’ real property.1 Defendants argue that the evidence does not support the court’s finding that the plaintiffs’ use of the road over defendants’ property was “adverse” for more than ten years. They also object to the location of a portion of the road, claiming that it will interfere with agricultural use in the future. They also contend that the court should have located an easement of necessity, as plaintiffs had requested in the alternative claim in their complaint, and determined…