Legal Opinion

Hooker v. Estate of Weinberger

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1979No. 42200, 42201PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCown, J.

In these two consolidated cases the claimants filed contingent claims against the estate of a decedent for an anticipated breach of contract. The claims were filed after the time limited for creditors to present their claims and the issue is whether such claims were properly allowed. The county court found that the claims were contingent claims incapable of being exhibited within the time limited for creditors to file claims and ordered the executor to retain sufficient funds to pay the contingent claims when they became absolute. On appeal the District Court affirmed the action of the county…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rehn v. BingamanNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Selig v. Wunderlich Contracting CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Campbell v. GallentineNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Travelers Insurance v. DishnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Burling v. Estate of AllvordNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Chadd v. Midwest Franchise Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Brtek v. CihalNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Crowder v. Aurora Co-Operative Elevator Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Anderson Excavating & Wrecking Co. v. Sanitary Improvement District No. 177Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Cavanaugh v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API