Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Gallentine

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1927No. 24922PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The appellees, hereinafter called plaintiffs, as guardians for Samuel Campbell, instituted this action in the district court for Hamilton county to recover $10,057.12 as damages for an alleged breach of the covenants in a warranty deed, dated May 5, 1902, covering an 80-acre tract, based on a consideration of $2,800 paid by Campbell to appellant, hereinafter called defendant, on such date, at which time *790possession by' the latter was surrendered to the former. The case was tried' to a jury, verdict and júdgment for plaintiffs for $2,800 with interest from March 12, 1910, the date when Campbell…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Trumble v. TrumbleNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Cheney v. StraubeNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Real v. HollisterNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Hampton v. WebsterNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Webb v. WheelerNebraska Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hooker v. Estate of WeinbergerNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Frye v. SibbittNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Clark v. Cypress Shores Development Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Omega Chemical Co., Inc. v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Storz v. ClarkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API