Legal Opinion

Cavanaugh v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1998No. S-96-491PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.

INTRODUCTION

The City of Omaha (City) is required to conduct promotion examinations according to the terms of the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the City and its police union. Undisputedly, the City failed to conform to the timetable of the CBA with respect to posting notice of a lieutenant examination and administering that examination during late 1989 and early 1990. As a result of the City’s actions, an otherwise ineligible sergeant was allowed to take the lieutenant examination that was administered on April 13, 1990, and he was later promoted. Timothy Cavanaugh also took…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Singer Co., Link Simulation Systems Division v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Gordon v. ConnellNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Upah v. Ancona Bros. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Brtek v. CihalNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hooker v. Estate of WeinbergerNebraska Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Carol Marmo v. Tyson Fresh MeatsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  2. Phipps v. Skyview Farms, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Snyder v. CaseNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Pennfield Oil Company v. WinstromNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. MORGAN v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSUR. CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API