Anderson Excavating & Wrecking Co. v. Sanitary Improvement District No. 177
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.
Anderson Excavating & Wrecking Company (Anderson) appeals from an order of the district court finding that Anderson had repudiated a contract it entered into with Sanitary Improvement District No. 177 (SID) and determining that Anderson was not entitled to damages. We affirm because the court was not clearly wrong when it found that Anderson had repudiated the contract.
BACKGROUND
In 1992, the SID sought bids for a seawall construction and dredging project at Riverside Lakes, which consists of residential property and adjoining manmade lakes. The project involved erecting seawalls around three…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chadd v. Midwest Franchise Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Gilmore v. DuderstadtNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Ruble v. ReichNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Hooker v. Estate of WeinbergerNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
3Cited by18 opinions
- Davenport Ltd. v. 75th & Dodge INebraska Supreme Court · 2010
- Professional Business Services Co. v. RosnoNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Homeland Training Center, LLC v. Summit Point Automotive Research CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Par 3, Inc. v. LivingstonNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- MBH, INC. v. John Otte Oil & Propane, Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.