Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance v. Palumbo

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 12, 2008No. AC 28409PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUPONT, J.

In this action for equitable subrogation, the defendant Stephen Palumbo 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, in favor of the plaintiff, Allstate Insurance Company. The defendant claims (1) that an equitable subrogation action brought by the plaintiff could not be maintained against him as the fiancee of the plaintiffs insured or as a cohabitant in the home of the plaintiffs insured and (2) that if the action was legally viable, the amount of the judgment was excessive and based on improperly admitted evidence. 2 We affirm the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Whitman Hotel Corporation v. Elliott & Watrous Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  3. American Oil Co. v. ValentiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Dilullo v. JosephSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  5. State v. SwintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Centimark Corp. v. Village Manor Associates Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  2. Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians v. LorinskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. Allstate Insurance v. PalumboSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. EQUICREDIT CORP. OF CONNECTICUT v. KasperConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  5. 300 State, LLC v. HanafinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API