Legal Opinion

Hutson v. Agricultural Ditch & Reservoir Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 7, 1986No. 84SC143PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSON, Justice.

We granted certiorari in Agricultural Ditch & Reservoir Co. v. Gleason, 686 P.2d 802 (Colo.App.1984), to determine whether an interest in a forty-foot strip of land acquired in a condemnation proceeding in 1876 was a “limited fee” or an easement. The court of appeals held in Gleason that the condemnation decree awarded the Agricultural Ditch & Reservoir Company (Ditch Company) limited fee title to the property. We conclude that the decree vested the Ditch Company with an easement and not with a limited fee. We reverse that portion of the judgment of the court of appeals…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wessells v. State, Department of HighwaysAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Harrison v. EverettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  3. McCotter v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Fastenau v. EngelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  5. Minneapolis Athletic Club v. CohlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Chevy Chase Land Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Wilcox v. Village of Manchester Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  3. Department of Transportation v. Gypsum Ranch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  4. Bijou Irrigation District v. Empire ClubSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. Hinojos v. LohmannColorado Court of Appeals · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API