Legal Opinion
State v. Windish
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 11, 1999No. C1-97-1134PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RUSSELL A. ANDERSON, Justice.
Appellant, Daniel James Windish, was convicted by a Ramsey County jury of making terroristic threats in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.713, subd. 1 (1998). Windish appealed his conviction solely on the grounds that his right to a speedy trial had been violated because his trial began one year and four days after his arrest. The court of appeals, despite labeling the delays “disturbing,” affirmed Windish’s conviction. State v. Windish, No. Cl-97-1134, 1998 WL 188549, at *2, *4 (Minn.App. April 21, 1998). We reverse and hold under our supervisory powers that the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Moore v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Kemen Lavatos Taylor, IISupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Dobbins v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. BeecroftSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. ChamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.