Legal Opinion

Hood Rubber Co. v. Commissioner of Corp. & Taxation

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 10, 1929PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to certify to the State treasurer, in accordance with G. L. c. 63, § 36, that the excise tax due from it, measured in part by its net income for 1922, is less than the amount paid by it for that year, to the end that repayment of the difference may be made to it.

The controversy arises out of conflicting contentions as to the meaning of G. L. c. 63, § 36, whereby is regulated the adjustment of the corporation excise tax with reference to the net income on which the Federal government bases its tax on the same corporation. Said §…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hecht v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Hanscom v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. James Everard's Breweries v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Loring v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Marcus v. Board of Street CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Wellesley College v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. DiMarzo v. American Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. WeloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Clark v. State Street Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Kneeland v. EmertonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API