Legal Opinion

Loring v. Young

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 8, 1921PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Petition for a writ of mandamus, filed on February 7, 1921, by Augustus P. Loring, who, with Benjamin Loring Young and Essex S. Abbott, comprised the joint special committee of the General Court of 1920 appointed under a resolve authorizing and directing the committee to prepare for the printers the revision of the General Laws of the Commonwealth and in connection therewith to provide for the printing in the first volume thereof of the Constitutions of the United States and…

Read the full summary

Petition for a writ of mandamus, filed on February 7, 1921, by Augustus P. Loring, who, with Benjamin Loring Young and Essex S. Abbott, comprised the joint special committee of the General Court of 1920 appointed under a resolve authorizing and directing the committee to prepare for the printers the revision of the General Laws of the Commonwealth and in connection therewith to provide for the printing in the first volume thereof of the Constitutions of the United States and of the Commonwealth, the petitioner alleging in substance “ that the respondents [the members of the committee other…

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

The General Court of 1920, by Res. c. 86, created a joint special committee to provide amongst other matters for the printing and distribution of the General Laws-and “ the printing of the Federal and State Constitutions in the first volume ” thereof.

The parties have treated that committee as performing purely ministerial functions, not partaking in any particular of those of the legislative department. The cases are considered on that assumption.

The single question presented is whether that committee shall print as the Constitution of the Commonwealth the Constitution of 1780 with the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. United States v. Wong Kim ArkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Luther v. BordenSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  5. Knox v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WeloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Sears v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  4. Inspector of Buildings v. StoklosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Brooks v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API