Legal Opinion

Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 1, 1930No. K-514PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHALEY, Judge.

The plaintiff in this action is seeking the recovery of income taxes assessed and collected under the provisions of the Revenue *888Act of 1921 (42 Stat. 227) for the calendar years of 1921 and 1922, aggregating the sum of $37,969.68, together with interest on $17,-635.07 from December 6, 1922, and on $20,-334.61 from December 5, 1923.

The petition was filed December 3, 1929, and the jurisdiction of this court is invoked under the provision of paragraph twentieth of section 24 of the Judicial Code, as amended, re-enacted by section 1122(c) of the Revenue Act of 1926, 28 USCA §…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Life Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Smietanka v. Indiana Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Davis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Ertle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  4. Loeb v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
  5. Dixie Margarine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API