Dixie Margarine Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
WHALEY, Judge.
The defendant has interposed a demurrer to the petition on the ground that even admitting the facts as alleged are true, nevertheless, the court is without jurisdiction because the plaintiff has failed to allege a refund claim was filed with the Commissioner within four years after the payment of the tax sought to he recovered. The facts alleged in the petition are:
During the period from March 15, 1923, to June 10, 1931, plaintiff was engaged in the manufacture and sale of a product composed of mixtures of vegetable oils, salt, skim or powdered milk, and water, with and without…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hills v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
- Hills v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
- International Curtis Marine Turbine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
- Davis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dixie Margarine Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Ertle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- Dixie Margarine Co. v. ShaeferCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- Loeb v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936