Legal Opinion

Dixie Margarine Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 4, 1935No. 43050PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHALEY, Judge.

The defendant has interposed a demurrer to the petition on the ground that even admitting the facts as alleged are true, nevertheless, the court is without jurisdiction because the plaintiff has failed to allege a refund claim was filed with the Commissioner within four years after the payment of the tax sought to he recovered. The facts alleged in the petition are:

During the period from March 15, 1923, to June 10, 1931, plaintiff was engaged in the manufacture and sale of a product composed of mixtures of vegetable oils, salt, skim or powdered milk, and water, with and without…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Hills v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  3. Hills v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  4. International Curtis Marine Turbine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  5. Davis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dixie Margarine Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  2. Ertle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  3. Dixie Margarine Co. v. ShaeferCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  4. Loeb v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API