Legal Opinion

Davis v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 6, 1929No. J-235PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Judge

The plaintiff, an Indian, received income from royalties on oil lands which were tax exempt, and, it is conceded, should not have been taxed in the first place. It is also true that if the refund in proper form and in compliance with the statute had been filed within the statutory period the Commissioner of Internal Revenue would have had to refund the tax.

On March 8,1920, the plaintiff filed her income-tax return, which showed income derived exclusively from proceeds of *647oil extracted from lands which, as stated, were tax exempt. She attached to her return a written protest against the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Tucker v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Feather River Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  4. Stauffer, Eshleman & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of Qual Krom South, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1990
  2. Hart Glass Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  3. Dodge v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  4. Grays Harbor Motorship Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  5. Philipsborn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API