Legal Opinion

Loeb v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 19, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNOX, District Judge.

This is an action at law to recover interest and penalties paid by the petitioner to the United States pursuant to a compromise agreement. The plaintiff has moved for summary judgment, and the defendant has made a cross-motion for dismissal of the complaint on the grounds that the court has no jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action, and that, on the merits, the plaintiff is entitled to no relief.

The facts as stipulated by the parties are as follows:

On or about January 4, 1922, the Collector of Internal Revenue, Second District of New York, hereinafter called the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United States v. ChildsSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Red Wing Malting Co. v. WillcutsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  5. De Treville v. SmallsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kurio v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
  2. Baker v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  3. Western Maryland Ry. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1938
  4. In the Matter of Pittsburgh Railways Company, Debtor, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  5. Phelps v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API