Legal Opinion

Howe v. Bank for International Settlements

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 26, 2002No. 1:00-cv-12485PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

LINDSAY, District Judge.

I. Introduction

This case involves allegations of “an unholy alliance of high public officials” and “large bullion banks” to manipulate the price of gold. Compl. ¶ 82. The plaintiff, Reginald H. Howe (the “plaintiff’ or “Howe”), asserts that various combinations of the defendants committed two interrelated sets of wrongful acts: first, that all of the defendants conspired to depress the price of gold; and second, that a subset of the defendants conspired to set an unfairly low price in the mandatory redemption of…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Lacedra v. Donald W. Wyatt Detention FacilityDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2004
  2. SFF-TIR, LLC v. StephensonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017
  3. Hatfill v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission v. SyronDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  5. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. MuddDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API