Legal Opinion
Hatfill v. Gonzales
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 16, 2007No. Civil Action 03-1793 (RBW)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
Currently before this Court is the Individual Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (“Defs.’ Mot.”) pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. 2 Additionally, defendant Tracy Henke also moves to dismiss the claims against her pursuant to Rule 12(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the ground of insufficiency of service of process. For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Abou-Hussein v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Beg Investments, LLC v. AlbertiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Leyland v. EdwardsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- County Board v. U.S. Department of TransportationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Davidson v. United States Department of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.