Legal Opinion

Seidenberg v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 1953No. 1338PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This appeal from a conviction in the Juvenile Court presents numerous claims of error-, but only one requires our consideration. The prosecution was instituted under the statute which provides that “any person who shall,- without just excuse, desert or wilfully neglect or refuse to provide for the support and maintenance of his or her minor children under the age of sixteen years in destitute or necessitous circumstances, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, * * *.” 1 The information charged that appellant “did neglect to provide for the support and maintenance,” etc., and the claim is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Rumely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  3. Old Monastery Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
  4. United States v. RenkenDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1944
  5. Pullen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burke v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API