Legal Opinion
United States v. Renken
District Court, W.D. South Carolina
Decided May 6, 1944No. 9181-9183PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYCHE, District Judge.
The indictments in the above cases charge the defendants named therein with conspiring to violate the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 904(a), and the Maximum Price Regulations issued in pursuance thereof, and with violations of the Act and Maximum Price Regulations issued thereunder.
Motions to quash, and demurrers to the indictments, are made upon the following grounds:
1. The allegations of the indictments fail to allege that the defendant or defendants wilfully violated, or wilfully conspired to violate, the Maximum Price Regulations No. 193…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Douglas v. City of JeannetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Tri-State Hotel Co. v. LonderholmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- George C. Finn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- United States v. George F. Fish, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Old Monastery Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
- Blumenthal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.