Legal Opinion

Hamaker v. Bryan

California Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1918No. L. A. No. 4164. Department TwoPublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiffs to recover damages for breach of contract to convey real estate, executed March 14, 1911. The code prescribes the ordinary measure of damages in such cases, and then makes this special provision, “but adding thereto, in case of bad faith, the difference between the price agreed to be paid and the value of the estate to be conveyed, ’ ’ etc. The price agreed to be paid in the instant case was thirty-three thousand five hundred dollars, of which $250 was paid and $4,750 agreed to be paid in cash, the balance by mortgage and trust deed on the property.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clark v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Morgan v. StearnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Yates v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Engasser v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Kendis v. CohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Wheeler v. OppenheimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Tancredi v. GarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Fara v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API