Fara v. Wells
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
These appeals are from the judgments for plaintiffs in two actions against the defendant, Daniel Wells. In the first action, Fara v. Wells, the plaintiffs seek damages for the breach of a contract in which defendant agreed to sell and convey to plaintiffs certain real property, improved with a dwelling house, in Palm Springs. In the second action, plaintiff, Harold J. Hicks, a real estate broker, sues to recover his commission on said sale. The two actions were consolidated for trial by stipulation of the parties and separate judgments were rendered by the trial court.
There is substantial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Fleming v. DolfinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Nelson v. Fernando Nelson & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Engasser v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Walter v. LibbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schmidt v. BeckelmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- House of Prayer v. Evangelical Ass'n for IndiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Tancredi v. GarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962