Legal Opinion
Killion v. Hulen
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 3, 1894No. 1,095PublishedCited by 6 opinions
From the Daviess Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The appellee sued the appellant to recover damages for the breach of a marriage contract.
The complaint is in two paragraphs, alike in general allegations, but differing only as to when the contract was to be performed.
In the first paragraph it is alleged that the appellant promised and agreed to marry appellee “on request,” while in the second paragraph the allegation is that he promised to marry her, “but no particular day for the onsummation of such marriage was fixed between them. ’ ’
The appellant answered in two paragraphs, the first being a general denial, and the second that the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Supreme Lodge, Knights of Honor of the World v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Landwerlen v. WheelerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Elliott v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Fort Wayne, Cincinnati & Louisville Railway Co. v. BeyerleIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fitzmaurice v. PuterbaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Green v. EdenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- Thompson v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Raper v. American Tin-Plate Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Week v. WidgeonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.