Raper v. American Tin-Plate Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Madison Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
Suit by appellant for personal injuries resulting from the alleged negligence of appellee. Demand, $10,000. Judgment for defendant.
The court, at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, upon proper motion directed the jury to return a verdict for the defendant. An effort is made to. question this action before this court. There are three assignments of error: *324(T) That the court erred in sustaining appellee’s motion to instruct the jury to find for the defendant; (2) the court erred in instructing the jury to find for the- defendant, and (3) in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cline v. LindseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Van Sickle v. BelknapIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Childress v. CallenderIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- North Western Mutual Life Insurance v. HeimannIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Butler v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Town of Argos v. HarleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
- Teeple v. State ex rel. BowerIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Bartley v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1942
- Cheek v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Williams v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.