Legal Opinion

Raper v. American Tin-Plate Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1901No. 18,921PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Erom the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

Suit by appellant for personal injuries resulting from the alleged negligence of appellee. Demand, $10,000. Judgment for defendant.

The court, at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, upon proper motion directed the jury to return a verdict for the defendant. An effort is made to. question this action before this court. There are three assignments of error: *324(T) That the court erred in sustaining appellee’s motion to instruct the jury to find for the defendant; (2) the court erred in instructing the jury to find for the- defendant, and (3) in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cline v. LindseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Van Sickle v. BelknapIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Childress v. CallenderIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. North Western Mutual Life Insurance v. HeimannIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Butler v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Town of Argos v. HarleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Teeple v. State ex rel. BowerIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Bartley v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Cheek v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Williams v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API