Wright & Kimbrough v. Dewees
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment rendered against them in the sum of $600 for commissions, with interest and costs. The action arises out of a contract for the sale of real estate between defendants, the owners, and plaintiff, a -corporation engaged in the real estate business, and containing, among others, the following provision: “The said ‘seller’ agrees should a sale or exchange of said above described property upon said or any satisfactory terms be effected during the period of time hereinafter named, by either party to this agreement, or any other party, or after determination of this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kimmell v. SkellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Brown v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Ropes v. John Rosenfeld's SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Maze v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Snook v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Leonard v. FallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Rice Lands & Products Co. v. BlevinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Mills v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Clients' Service, Inc. v. PupoWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Hobson v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.