Legal Opinion
Miller v. King County
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 8, 1962No. 36103PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.
June 26, 1890, Henry Bucey and Nellie Bucey, his wife, being then the owners of the land involved in this proceeding, filed a plat of Buenna, King County, Washington, in the office of the county auditor, in which plat the area was divided into lots and blocks. The streets and alleys were dedicated for public use in the following manner:
“Know all men by these presents, that we [here naming the plat owners] . . . have caused the foregoing plat . . . to be made; . . . that the names of all the Streets and Avenues are noted on the plat; . . . that we do hereby donate, grant and dedicate to public…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Murphy v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Lindsey v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- King County v. Hanson Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
- Ritzman v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Turner v. DavissonWashington Supreme Court · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. SponburghWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Davis v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- Real Progress, Inc. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- In RE HENDERSON v. McCulloughWashington Supreme Court · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.