Legal Opinion
Gillis v. King County
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1953No. 32351PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hamley, J.—In
the above-entitled cases, consolidated for the purpose of trial and appeal, plaintiffs seek decrees vacating certain portions of Indianapolis street and quieting their titles thereto. Judgment was entered for defendant in both cases, and plaintiffs have appealed.
The facts are not in dispute. On May 9, 1906, Seaboard Security Company filed for record in the office of the auditor of King County a plat of Lake Shore View Addition to the city of Seattle. In this plat, certain streets were dedicated to the public, including Indianapolis street, now designated east Ninety-fifth street.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Prall v. BurckharttIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
- Bruenn v. North Yakima School District No. 7Washington Supreme Court · 1918
- Guarantee Loan & Trust Co. v. FayWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Murphy v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Town of West Seattle v. West Seattle Land & Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- In Re F.D. Processing, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Godfrey v. WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Miebach v. ColasurdoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Lawson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Scott Paper Co. v. City of AnacortesWashington Supreme Court · 1978
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.