Legal Opinion

Frye v. Frye

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1987No. 17650PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case presents the question whether the doctrine of equitable adoption may be utilized to impose a duty to pay child support. We hold that, on the facts of this case, it may.

Charles and Cynthia Frye were married in 1982. Cynthia had a daughter, Amanda, by another marriage. Amanda was less than one and one-half years old when her mother married Charles, and was treated as Charles’ own daughter throughout their marriage. She now perceives Charles alone as her father.

Both before and after marriage, the couple discussed whether Charles should adopt Amanda. Cynthia denies having…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sargeant v. SargeantNevada Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Bower v. LandaNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State Ex Rel. Welfare Division of the Department of Human Resources v. VineNevada Supreme Court · 1983

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. Matter of Baby Boy C.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Russo v. GardnerNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Hermanson v. HermansonNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Chambers ex rel. Cochran v. SandersonNevada Supreme Court · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API